<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unions; Is There Still A Need For Them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/</link>
	<description>This is where your finance takes place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:49:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3610</guid>
		<description>A resounding YES from two different perspectives.

a) I&#039;ve worked in a jurisdiction where managers LIKE unions.  We like to think we are delivering decent employment and all constructive efforts in that regard are welcome.  If there was no union, we would encourage its formation.

b) I&#039;ve worked in a jurisdiction where managers hate unions.  Frankly I though the managers were close to requiring sectioning.  They imagined all sorts of problems and created all sorts of difficulties.  They couldn&#039;t get contracts written on time but they could letters of suspension in duplicate for nothing more than a notice to strike.  

All unions are doing is working with us.  I sometimes they seem militant, I would do an Obama. Sit down and find out what is bothering people.  With a bit of effort, I am sure I will &quot;get it&quot; eventually.  Employees are NOT my enemy.  They have different interests though than I do and than my financial stakeholders do.  Organized discussions help us move forward together.  Go unions!  More than happy to work with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A resounding YES from two different perspectives.</p>
<p>a) I&#8217;ve worked in a jurisdiction where managers LIKE unions.  We like to think we are delivering decent employment and all constructive efforts in that regard are welcome.  If there was no union, we would encourage its formation.</p>
<p>b) I&#8217;ve worked in a jurisdiction where managers hate unions.  Frankly I though the managers were close to requiring sectioning.  They imagined all sorts of problems and created all sorts of difficulties.  They couldn&#8217;t get contracts written on time but they could letters of suspension in duplicate for nothing more than a notice to strike.  </p>
<p>All unions are doing is working with us.  I sometimes they seem militant, I would do an Obama. Sit down and find out what is bothering people.  With a bit of effort, I am sure I will &#8220;get it&#8221; eventually.  Employees are NOT my enemy.  They have different interests though than I do and than my financial stakeholders do.  Organized discussions help us move forward together.  Go unions!  More than happy to work with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcendental Success</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3456</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcendental Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3456</guid>
		<description>Trust me, unions are a benefit.  You&#039;re a professional who wears a suit and tie to work so the extent of your abuse might be getting yelled at or having the coffee machine broken for too long.  You can always get a new job with your transferrable skills and clients.

Workers in dangerous environments or where they are being using as &quot;machines&quot; need unions to protect them.  Management almost always considers them expendable -- not publicly of course, but they always want to see how close to the line they can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me, unions are a benefit.  You&#8217;re a professional who wears a suit and tie to work so the extent of your abuse might be getting yelled at or having the coffee machine broken for too long.  You can always get a new job with your transferrable skills and clients.</p>
<p>Workers in dangerous environments or where they are being using as &#8220;machines&#8221; need unions to protect them.  Management almost always considers them expendable &#8212; not publicly of course, but they always want to see how close to the line they can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3449</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Economy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3449</guid>
		<description>While you raise some good and valid points in here, I&#039;m not sure that there are enough people that would agree with you concerning &quot;I understand that unions were necessary a while ago since employers were treating their employees like dogs.&quot;  There are still a large number of companies that do just that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you raise some good and valid points in here, I&#8217;m not sure that there are enough people that would agree with you concerning &#8220;I understand that unions were necessary a while ago since employers were treating their employees like dogs.&#8221;  There are still a large number of companies that do just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of Money Stories &#171; Funny about Money</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3446</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of Money Stories &#171; Funny about Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3446</guid>
		<description>[...] Financial Blogger Unions: Is There Still a Need for Them? Noisy activists drive blogger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Financial Blogger Unions: Is There Still a Need for Them? Noisy activists drive blogger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funny about Money</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3427</link>
		<dc:creator>Funny about Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3427</guid>
		<description>Please. Come to a right-to-work state and try to make a living here. Housing, food, utilities, and gas are no cheaper than in states where unions are active, but wages are...well, laughable.

Oh. But part of your pay is the lovely weather. Think of all those warm woolens you won&#039;t have to buy.

Right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please. Come to a right-to-work state and try to make a living here. Housing, food, utilities, and gas are no cheaper than in states where unions are active, but wages are&#8230;well, laughable.</p>
<p>Oh. But part of your pay is the lovely weather. Think of all those warm woolens you won&#8217;t have to buy.</p>
<p>Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3421</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3421</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s good to hear that your efforts are recognised with the security they deserve. I wish it was the same for every employee.

trust me the second that the majority move away from unionization, the second we need it more than we ever did. Especially in the current climate!

i do wish that the unions were a bit maturer though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s good to hear that your efforts are recognised with the security they deserve. I wish it was the same for every employee.</p>
<p>trust me the second that the majority move away from unionization, the second we need it more than we ever did. Especially in the current climate!</p>
<p>i do wish that the unions were a bit maturer though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle B</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>Oh Ye Innocents ! Beware the rogue company! Retired now, but have been royally screwed up the tender spot by knowledgeable shits that spend most their time circulating amongst their own kind, legal and quasi-legal means and methods for culling, killing, entrapping, seducing, fooling, screwing, duping, doping, disenfranchising, destroying, humiliating, deselecting, discriminating legally, disorienting, overworking, over facing,  selecting and controlling personnel. Some of these cruel farces are available on the net, most are regarded company secrets. The &quot;Human Resources&quot; person who can &quot;Shape&quot; personnel to suit upper management is a most valued corporate gangster. Machiavelli had nothing on these smooth criminals, who will use entrapment, hidden microphones, former employer interviews, former work mate interviews, credit records,  washroom cameras, lunchroom mikes, well paid prostitutes, dope dealers, neighborhood gossips, legal loopholes, and even outright lies to keep their share of the pie, even if it costs you your career! Most people don&#039;t realize the underside of their employment. That&#039;s a good thing! HR professionals like to work in the dark!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Ye Innocents ! Beware the rogue company! Retired now, but have been royally screwed up the tender spot by knowledgeable shits that spend most their time circulating amongst their own kind, legal and quasi-legal means and methods for culling, killing, entrapping, seducing, fooling, screwing, duping, doping, disenfranchising, destroying, humiliating, deselecting, discriminating legally, disorienting, overworking, over facing,  selecting and controlling personnel. Some of these cruel farces are available on the net, most are regarded company secrets. The &#8220;Human Resources&#8221; person who can &#8220;Shape&#8221; personnel to suit upper management is a most valued corporate gangster. Machiavelli had nothing on these smooth criminals, who will use entrapment, hidden microphones, former employer interviews, former work mate interviews, credit records,  washroom cameras, lunchroom mikes, well paid prostitutes, dope dealers, neighborhood gossips, legal loopholes, and even outright lies to keep their share of the pie, even if it costs you your career! Most people don&#8217;t realize the underside of their employment. That&#8217;s a good thing! HR professionals like to work in the dark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>Yep, and I totally agree. I used to work for a company that has union organization. And the result you get is, no matter how hard you work, the bonus is shared across the whole company. It allows people to be lazy, and dependent on other people to do work. You probably need one person out of 5 people to actually do work, cuz the rest just want to get their pay check and then going home.  It&#039;s pretty damn sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, and I totally agree. I used to work for a company that has union organization. And the result you get is, no matter how hard you work, the bonus is shared across the whole company. It allows people to be lazy, and dependent on other people to do work. You probably need one person out of 5 people to actually do work, cuz the rest just want to get their pay check and then going home.  It&#8217;s pretty damn sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Pilgrim</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3418</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Pilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3418</guid>
		<description>Whether we agree with tactics or not, the concept of unionization is still a good one.  Whistle blowers (in the annoying sense, rather than the accountability sense) may be annoying, but collective action is still a sensible way for labour to ensure it is being treated fairly.  Where personal relationships between ownership and labour exist, it may not be so crucial.  But large corporations do have a tendency to attempt to exploit labour (in fact their shareholders practically require it).  

At their best, unions hold corporations accountable.  At there worst, they can be unreasonable and lead to bad economic reality for a corporation.  90% of the time, the corporation still wins.

Finally, our consumption-based economy requires well-paying jobs for continued growth.  Unions push companies to provide those jobs.  Do we all want to work for Walmart?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether we agree with tactics or not, the concept of unionization is still a good one.  Whistle blowers (in the annoying sense, rather than the accountability sense) may be annoying, but collective action is still a sensible way for labour to ensure it is being treated fairly.  Where personal relationships between ownership and labour exist, it may not be so crucial.  But large corporations do have a tendency to attempt to exploit labour (in fact their shareholders practically require it).  </p>
<p>At their best, unions hold corporations accountable.  At there worst, they can be unreasonable and lead to bad economic reality for a corporation.  90% of the time, the corporation still wins.</p>
<p>Finally, our consumption-based economy requires well-paying jobs for continued growth.  Unions push companies to provide those jobs.  Do we all want to work for Walmart?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/unions-is-there-still-a-need-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/?p=806#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>I remember hearing about a construction company that was going through a hard time.  The entire staff was union.  He asked the employees for a temporary reduction in their wages while they were going through this patch so he could keep the business afloat.
The union decided that wasn&#039;t a good idea and refused to do anything about it, they may have even asked for more wages.
Well, he shut down the company, created another one that was a non union company, and told all of them if they wanted to come back to work it was as a non union employee.

Needless to say, unions were needed many years ago when they were first created.  Now, I believe they are akin to legalized Mobs (unless that title is already taken by record labels, phone companies, and/or banks?).

Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember hearing about a construction company that was going through a hard time.  The entire staff was union.  He asked the employees for a temporary reduction in their wages while they were going through this patch so he could keep the business afloat.<br />
The union decided that wasn&#8217;t a good idea and refused to do anything about it, they may have even asked for more wages.<br />
Well, he shut down the company, created another one that was a non union company, and told all of them if they wanted to come back to work it was as a non union employee.</p>
<p>Needless to say, unions were needed many years ago when they were first created.  Now, I believe they are akin to legalized Mobs (unless that title is already taken by record labels, phone companies, and/or banks?).</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
