<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live Smith Manoeuvre Example, August update</title>
	<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/</link>
	<description>This is where your finance takes place</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Money</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>So far I'm finding the book quite good and easy to understand. Its a quick and easy read. I wish I had read it back in the 1980s! 

I just posted some coments on the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far I&#8217;m finding the book quite good and easy to understand. Its a quick and easy read. I wish I had read it back in the 1980s! </p>
<p>I just posted some coments on the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financial Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financial Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Hi CM,
I'll get September update probably by the end of next week. I always believed in the SM but never had a chance to do it. Then, I'll be able to prove if I was right or wrong about it!

I heard the book was not that great. While I read a lot about the SM,  I never read the "official book". Let me know what you think about it!

Cheers,

FB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi CM,<br />
I&#8217;ll get September update probably by the end of next week. I always believed in the SM but never had a chance to do it. Then, I&#8217;ll be able to prove if I was right or wrong about it!</p>
<p>I heard the book was not that great. While I read a lot about the SM,  I never read the &#8220;official book&#8221;. Let me know what you think about it!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>FB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Money</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your real time experiences with the SM. I just started reading his book. I look forward to more of your updates.

I like the fact that the SM is a "gradual process". This gives one  some time to "get use to the idea" of not paying down the debt and to break out of the working class paradime that says we must run away from our mortgage debt as fast as we can. 

CM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your real time experiences with the SM. I just started reading his book. I look forward to more of your updates.</p>
<p>I like the fact that the SM is a &#8220;gradual process&#8221;. This gives one  some time to &#8220;get use to the idea&#8221; of not paying down the debt and to break out of the working class paradime that says we must run away from our mortgage debt as fast as we can. </p>
<p>CM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financial Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financial Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>Hi Dawger,
The $3,500 corresponds to the amount of principal I would have paid on a regular mortgage since I started my SM back in February. In order to setup a HELOC, you absolutely need a minimum of 20% equity in your house. This means that if your house is appraised at 300K, your bank will offer a HELOC for a maximum of 240K (80% of 300K). However, some banks offer this product up to 90% of the appraised value (I know National Bank has this product) but other specific conditions applies.
Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dawger,<br />
The $3,500 corresponds to the amount of principal I would have paid on a regular mortgage since I started my SM back in February. In order to setup a HELOC, you absolutely need a minimum of 20% equity in your house. This means that if your house is appraised at 300K, your bank will offer a HELOC for a maximum of 240K (80% of 300K). However, some banks offer this product up to 90% of the appraised value (I know National Bank has this product) but other specific conditions applies.<br />
Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawger</title>
		<link>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>dawger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/live-smith-manoeuvre-example-august-update/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Does this mean you have just $3,500 in equity on your mortgage? My banker dismissed my idea of opening the HELCO and doing the smith manoeuvre because I did not have 20% equity built up in the house.

Could you clarify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean you have just $3,500 in equity on your mortgage? My banker dismissed my idea of opening the HELCO and doing the smith manoeuvre because I did not have 20% equity built up in the house.</p>
<p>Could you clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
